• Articles
  • News
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Website Terms of Use
  • Contact
Total Packers - Green Bay Packers Blogs and News
  • Home
  • Analysis
  • Packers News
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Analysis
  • Packers News
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
No Result
View All Result
Total Packers
No Result
View All Result

Aaron Rodgers Did Go For The Opt-Out Clause

Joseph Bonham by Joseph Bonham
August 30, 2018
in Uncategorized
Reading Time: 2 mins read
5

Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers got himself a nice deal with his new contract. However, it’s not the exact deal that maybe he wanted.

Although he previously denied asking for an opt-out clause — or at least referred to it as conjecture — Rodgers admitted he asked for that on Thursday. He and his agent, David Dunn, also explored having Rodgers’ salary tied to a percentage of the salary cap.

Those were non-starters for the Packers.

“The number of players on the active roster and counting on the salary cap is definitely a hindrance to some of that stuff,” Rodgers said.

“There’s language in guaranteed contracts that needs to change in the next CBA in order for those to become more standard across the league or more opportunities for those. But there’s just not the movement in that area on franchise sides to want to do contracts that allow players to have more of the leverage that NBA players have. Instead, they would rather go traditional routes with the usual large signing bonuses prorated over the duration of the deal up to five years in order to minimize the cap hit in certain years. That’s the desired approach of teams, and there wasn’t a lot of wiggle room in that area.”

Clearly, that’s why these negotiations took so long. They began just after the season ended.

Ultimately, it appears Rodgers took a more traditional deal because he knew it was best for the team. He again referred to his relationship with the Packers as a partnership.

“As much as we were interested in the idea of a non-traditional, ultimately the most important thing is the Packers feel like this is a partnership and that I feel like it’s a partnership and we can get 19, 20 years and feel good about the relationship and the career that I had in Green Bay.”

Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst admitted that the traditional type of contract structure is what’s best for the Packers.

“This was about the Green Bay Packers and our team,” Gutekunst said. “The rest of the league wasn’t something I was concerned about at all. This was what’s best for us. And like I said, I think (chief negotiator) Russ (Ball) looked at all the options, went down every road to kind of see what would be best for us and the player, and I think we came to an agreement. Like I said, I think that was the ultimate case. I think this was a really good deal for both sides.”

Rodgers’ contract now takes him through the season in which he’ll turn 40. He’s said before he wants to play until he’s 40 and mentioned that again on Thursday.

So you’re stuck with Aaron Rodgers for six more years and maybe more. And I expect nothing less than six straight championships.

Tags: Aaron RodgersFeaturedGreen Bay Packers
Previous Post

Can DeShone Kizer Win A Game?

Next Post

Colin Cowherd Exposed On Aaron Rodgers

Joseph Bonham

Joseph Bonham

Joseph is a fiction writer when he isn't doing this. In his spare time he likes to do manly things like drink beer and procreate.

Packers Shock Motown 29-22 on Thanksgiving

What Does Thanksgiving’s Win in Detroit Mean for Green Bay

November 26, 2023
Jordan Love scrambles against Detroit Lions

Packers Shock Motown 29-22 on Thanksgiving

November 24, 2023
Repeated Negative Happenings Can Get in Your Head

Expanded Overview of Packers vs Steelers Game

November 12, 2023
Jordan Love runs down the field

Game Day: Packers vs Rams – Week 9

November 5, 2023
Next Post
Aaron Rodgers Kentucky Derby

Colin Cowherd Exposed On Aaron Rodgers

Comments 5

  1. Avatar for Kato Kato says:
    5 years ago

    Only one thing left to do. Trade for Khalil Mack. At first I was all for it, then I thought two first round picks and paying $20 million a year was going to be too high a price to pay. I have come around on it again though. This team’s window is now. Contrary to popular belief, this team does have a fair number of nice players. I would argue they are one superstar on defense away from being serious championship contenders. The time is now, these kind of defensive players don’t become available very often. The bigger the reward, the bigger the risks you have to take. This team dicked around too long waiting on draft and develop, was too conservative in nearly every face of the operation.

  2. Avatar for Big B Big B says:
    5 years ago

    Kato’s right. Two number ones seems exorbitant, but I’m presuming both will be > 20. First round picks are a 50-50 proposition for success anyway, with that likely decreasing the later in the round you draft. Odds of getting a player like this are remote unless you have a top 5 choice. We know what Mack’s skills and production are- in contrast to a draft choice, he’s a known commodity. It really just comes down to $. Mathews and Cobb big money comes off at the end of the year. Gimme Mack for that. I am liking this idea the more I think about it. Unless Fackrell or Biegel get transfused with some LT DNA we have no future pass rush threats- and probably couldn’t even draft one with the picks in 2019. Carpe diem.

    • Avatar for Kato Kato says:
      5 years ago

      Yeah, I mean I know they are high on Reggie Gilbert, but do you want to count on him to force a big fumble late in a game in January? Not saying he can’t, just saying I want the known commodity. And hey, if Reggie Gilbert does indeed become a stud, then that’s all the better, they just have a deeper bench and the defense even better. Can never have enough quality pass rushers

      • Avatar for PF4L PF4L says:
        5 years ago

        Damn Kato…..where did you come from with all these righteous statements? Adding talent, adds depth. Having a fresh body come in on a 7,8 minute drive is priceless. Depth….something we had in 2010.

  3. Avatar for PF4L PF4L says:
    5 years ago

    As far as the article. I’ll go out on a limb and say that Rodgers and his agent knew they had slim to zero chance of getting an opt out, or percentage escalators. But as in most negotiations, you have to “give up” something you want to make the other side feel like they got a win. The genius comes when, whatever you are giving up, means very little to you. Sometimes you invent “wants” to give them up.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Total Packers - Green Bay Packers News and Rumors

Subscribe to Packers News Updates

100% Spam Free - Unsubscribe at any time.

Find It!

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Game Day: Packers vs Chiefs – Can a Playoffs Chance Be Saved?
  • Has Jordan Love proved Himself as Green Bay’s Franchise QB?
  • What Does Thanksgiving’s Win in Detroit Mean for Green Bay
  • Packers Shock Motown 29-22 on Thanksgiving
  • Packers vs Lions – Game Day: Turkey Day Edition
  • Packers’ Super Bowl Chances are Tiny but Future Draft Picks Suggest They Will Bounce Back
  • Packers Overcome Kicking Gaffs, Beat Chargers 23-20
  • Game Day: Chargers vs Packers at Lambeau Field
  • Packers Fail to Capitalize, Fall in Pittsburgh 23-19
  • Expanded Overview of Packers vs Steelers Game
  • Packers Beat Rams 20-3
  • Game Day: Packers vs Rams – Week 9

Popular Tags

A.J. Hawk Aaron Rodgers Brett Favre Brian Gutekunst Bryan Bulaga Charles Woodson Chicago Bears Chicago Bears Clay Matthews Clay Matthews III Dallas Cowboys Davante Adams Detroit Lions Eddie Lacy fans Featured free agents game analysis Green Bay Packers Green Bay Packers Greg Jennings injuries Jay Cutler Jermichael Finley Jordy Nelson Julius Peppers Mike McCarthy Mike McCarthy Minnesota Vikings Morgan Burnett New England Patriots New Orleans Saints NFL Oakland Raiders Philadelphia Eagles predictions Randall Cobb Sam Shields San Francisco 49ers Seattle Seahawks T.J. Lang Ted Thompson Ted Thompson Tramon Williams Ty Montgomery
No Result
View All Result
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Articles
  • News
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Website Terms of Use
  • Contact

© 2023 Total Packers -- This site is not affiliated with the Green Bay Packers or Packers.com

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Analysis
  • Packers News
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

© 2023 Total Packers -- This site is not affiliated with the Green Bay Packers or Packers.com