• Articles
  • News
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Website Terms of Use
  • Contact
Total Packers - Green Bay Packers Blogs and News
  • Home
  • Analysis
  • Packers News
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Analysis
  • Packers News
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
No Result
View All Result
Total Packers
No Result
View All Result

Browns, Broncos Reportedly Interested in Packers’ Pick

Mordecai Jones by Mordecai Jones
April 24, 2016
in Uncategorized
6

Paxton Lynch

Here’s an intriguing idea. The Green Bay Packers trade out of or back in the first round to acquire additional selections.

That option has reportedly been presented to Packers general manger Ted Thompson. Both the Cleveland Browns, who own the No. 32 pick, and the Denver Broncos, who own the No. 31 pick, have called about moving up to No. 27, according to Walter Football.

The Broncos are apparently eying Memphis quarterback Paxton Lynch — who, as an aside, looks like he’s going to an audition for the Backstreet Boys — and feel they need to jump ahead of the Kansas City Chiefs (No. 28) to nab him.

If the Packers swapped places with the Broncos (and acquired another pick for doing so), they would be choosing last in the first round. The No. 31 pick is the final pick of the first round this year because the New England Patriots were stripped of their first-round pick for deflating footballs.

There likely isn’t much difference between the guy the Packers could select at No. 27 than the one they could select at No. 31. It might even turn out to be the same guy.

The same scenario exists with the Browns, although their No. 32 pick is the first of the second round. Thus, the Packers wouldn’t be making a selection on the first day of the draft.

That has happened once before under Thompson.

In 2008, Thompson sent the Packers’ No. 30 pick to the New York Jets for their No. 36 and No. 102 pick. They also gave up their No. 113 and No. 162 picks. Essentially, the Packers moved up in the second and fourth round, out of the first and gave up one of their three fifth rounders.

That second-round pick from the Jets was Jordy Nelson.

In all likelihood, a trade like this won’t happen with the Packers before the draft is in progress. Thompson will want to evaluate who’s on the board at No. 27 before deciding what to do with the pick.

Tags: 2016 NFL DraftCleveland BrownsDenver BroncosGreen Bay Packers
Previous Post

Jared Abbrederis is Giving Coaching a Shot

Next Post

Jordy Nelson Visited the Delaware Blue Hens

Packers vs Jets 2018

Recapping Packers 2019 Off-Season Moves

July 9, 2019
Green Bay Packers in snow

[Updated] A Look Ahead at the 2019 Packers Schedule

April 17, 2019
Geronimo Allison injury against Buffalo

Were the Packers Snake-bit with Serious Injuries Last Season?

February 23, 2019
Jimmy Graham - November 2018

Can the Course of Jimmy Graham’s Career Be Reversed?

February 18, 2019
Next Post
Jordy Nelson in Delaware

Jordy Nelson Visited the Delaware Blue Hens

Comments 6

  1. Avatar for Chad Lundberg Chad Lundberg says:
    7 years ago

    Intriguing… I actually kind of like this idea. Unless somehow we miss Reggie Ragland, that’s about the only scenario that would piss me off.

  2. Avatar for g g says:
    7 years ago

    Get off raglan’s nuts..he is not that great. He is just a name people are getting familiar with and keep bringing up

    • Avatar for Chad Lundberg Chad Lundberg says:
      7 years ago

      No. I will continue sucking on his nuts, much to your dismay and discomfort. So HA!

    • Avatar for TyKo Steamboat TyKo Steamboat says:
      7 years ago

      Ragland is 2nd on my wishlist of talent behind Sheldon Rankins. I believe both will be long gone before 27.

      next would be 3.) Darron Lee, 4.) Vernon Butler ect.

      …………………

      But, yes. Trade-back would be fine by me in the 1st with potential trade-up in the 2nd & 3rd rounds.

  3. Avatar for g g says:
    7 years ago

    Do your thing..suck as much dick as you want.

    Maybe look up every now and to actually see a little football, instead of just spewing what you hear the loosers on here say.

  4. Avatar for Kato Kato says:
    7 years ago

    I like Ragland a lot as a physical presence in the middle of the defense. However the packers need someone that can cover, and I don’t think he could provide that element.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Total Packers - Green Bay Packers News and Rumors

Find It!

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Packers Season Recap: Best NFL Highlights from Green Bay
  • Comparing The 2022 First Round Wide Receivers with Christian Watson and Romeo Doubs
  • Look Into the Top 5 Favorites of This Season’s 2023 Super Bowl
  • Reviewing Gutekunst, the Packers Roster and Coaches: Where Did it All Go Wrong: The Preseason Decisions
  • Packers Fall Apart in 4th: Lose 20-16 to End Season
  • Packers vs Lions – Game Day: Week 18
  • Packers Make Statement: Pound Vikings 41-17
  • Packers vs Vikings – Game Day: Week 17
  • Packers vs Vikings: The Pack Needs to Save the Season
  • Packers Deliver Huge Present: 26-20 Over Dolphins
  • Packers Bring Rams; Mayfield Back to Earth 24-12
  • Packers vs Rams – Game Day: Week 15

Popular Tags

A.J. Hawk Aaron Rodgers Brett Favre Brian Gutekunst Bryan Bulaga Charles Woodson Chicago Bears Chicago Bears Clay Matthews Clay Matthews III Dallas Cowboys Davante Adams Detroit Lions Eddie Lacy fans Featured free agents game analysis Green Bay Packers Green Bay Packers Greg Jennings injuries Jay Cutler Jermichael Finley Jordy Nelson Julius Peppers Mike McCarthy Mike McCarthy Minnesota Vikings Morgan Burnett New England Patriots New Orleans Saints NFL Oakland Raiders Philadelphia Eagles predictions Randall Cobb Sam Shields San Francisco 49ers Seattle Seahawks T.J. Lang Ted Thompson Ted Thompson Tramon Williams Ty Montgomery
No Result
View All Result
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Articles
  • News
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Website Terms of Use
  • Contact

© 2022 Total Packers -- This site is not affiliated with the Green Bay Packers or Packers.com

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Analysis
  • Packers News
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

© 2022 Total Packers -- This site is not affiliated with the Green Bay Packers or Packers.com