• Articles
  • News
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Website Terms of Use
  • Contact
Total Packers - Green Bay Packers Blogs and News
  • Home
  • Analysis
  • Packers News
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Analysis
  • Packers News
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
No Result
View All Result
Total Packers
No Result
View All Result

Barnett Could Wind Up In San Diego

Monty McMahon by Monty McMahon
July 9, 2011
in Uncategorized
11
Nick Barnett
The Packers should have suitors for Barnett.

We’ve talked about the possibility of [intlink id=”139″ type=”category”]Nick Barnett[/intlink] being the odd man out at linebacker for the Green Bay Packers and one place he could potentially end up is in San Diego, where the Chargers are in a state of flux at the position.

The Packers are set on the inside with [intlink id=”492″ type=”category”]Desmond Bishop[/intlink] and [intlink id=”80″ type=”category”]A.J. Hawk[/intlink], both of whom signed new contracts with the team in the past year. Barnett is coming off his second season-ending injury in three years and has a salary north of $4 million, which would make him a very expensive backup.

San Diego, meanwhile, has three prospective free agents at inside linebacker — Stephen Cooper, Kevin Burnett and Brandon Siler. Burnett is a good bet to return, according to ESPN’s Bill Williamson and the team drafted Jonas Mouton in the second round, but may still be looking to add a veteran.

Matt Williamson of Scouts Inc. said he thinks a potential Barnett-Chargers’ pairing is intriguing.

“He wouldn’t be a bad fit at all,” Williamson said. “He’s a very solid football player. He’s experienced in the 3-4 on the outside. I still think he has plenty left in the tank. San Diego’s inside linebacker situation is in such a state of flux, it is hard to predict who he would be playing next to on the inside, but I see him more as a weakside inside linebacker that system.”

Barnett certainly still has value and the ability to start in the NFL, so it will be interesting to see if a trade market develops for him once the lockout ends.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Tags: A.J. HawkBrandon SilerDesmond BishopGreen Bay PackersKevin BurnettNick BarnettNick BarnettSan Diego ChargersStephen Cooper
Previous Post

We Finally Have A Lockout Ruling

Next Post

Packers Have Salary Cap Problems

Mike McCarthy argues with NFL referee

Would a Video Referee Be Useful in Football?

August 21, 2019
Packers vs Jets 2018

Recapping Packers 2019 Off-Season Moves

July 9, 2019
Green Bay Packers in snow

[Updated] A Look Ahead at the 2019 Packers Schedule

April 17, 2019
Geronimo Allison injury against Buffalo

Were the Packers Snake-bit with Serious Injuries Last Season?

February 23, 2019
Next Post

Packers Have Salary Cap Problems

Comments 11

  1. Michael John says:
    11 years ago

    I am hopeful. It doesn’t seem like they’ll keep this guy who I never considered “packer people”. When he got hurt I honestly thought “great that will give AJ Hawk a chance to prove himself, a guy who doesn’t run his mouth, is a team guy, and who is actually hungry.”

    His and Jermichael’s injuries are pretty much the spark that led to them finding their identity. They were no longer bogged down with guys who like to talk with not a lot to show for it.

  2. Jeremy says:
    11 years ago

    “He’s experienced in the 3-4 on the outside.”

    Did he play outside in the 3-4 at Oregon St? Because he’s always been an ILB in Green Bay.

    • Asimov says:
      11 years ago

      It sure would be nice if he had experience on the outside…I’d take Barnett, Bishop, Hawk, and Matthews, but I’m pretty sure he doesn’t have the explosiveness needed to play OLB in a 3-4.

  3. Matt says:
    11 years ago

    doesnt’ have the explosiveness??? and brady poppinga does?!?!?! it BLOWS MY MIND all this talk about how the packers need a dominant force opposite clay matthews. HELLO!!! we have nick fucking barnett and i dont care what the hell position he wants to play he should play olb! i mean its like they dont even consider it! WHY??? so we can rotate brad jones, walden, and poppinga?!?!?! seriously someone explain this to me!!!

  4. BubbaOne says:
    11 years ago

    I’m not convinced Barnett is done in GB. I’m not sure Chillar can return from his third shoulder surgery. If he’s done and Barnett isn’t here who is the ILB backup, Francois, DL Smith, Diyral Briggs? We saw last year how a position of strength can become a weakness w/ one injury.
    Barnett has incentive to return being 8 tackles short of the all time record and said he wants to work w/ the team (renegotiate?). TT has been known to keep expensive backups before and if they can make a cap freindly contract NB may stay.
    Let’s not forget we have a 3-5 year window as we try to win multiple Super Bowls so even as TT keeps an eye on the future the leaning has to be a little more on the present. Yes, NB can be a pain in the butt and yet what a great security blanket as a signal caller and veteran backer.
    What I don’t want to see is Green bay South. Cullen Jenkins is said to be a high priority FA signing by Dud Bears. Jame Jones has been mentioned as a good fit for them. And they only have two LB’s on their roster. Could NB end up in Chicago as a outside backer in their 4-3 D? I hope not.

  5. David says:
    11 years ago

    Next article spells it out… Packers are over the salary cap already with none of the rookies been signed.

    Tauscher and Barnett’s salaries have to go… as well as a few others.

  6. iltarion says:
    11 years ago

    I have always been fine with Barnett, but I think some people have gotten over-excited about a guy who typically can’t even finish a season.

    To play OLB in our system, you need to be able to rush the passer or cover the flat, and you have to be at least mediocre against the run. By those standards, Walden, Zombo, and Brad Jones are all better options than Barnett.

    Throughout his entire career, Barnett has never distinguished himself as a pass rusher, and he’s had plenty of opportunities. He’s also somewhat short to play OLB in a 3-4. His best position would be weakside LB in a 4-3.

  7. iltarion says:
    11 years ago

    The ideal situation would be for Barnett to redo his deal at league minimum for someone with his tenure and stay with the Packers as a back-up LB.

    I would lose ZERO sleep over Barnett being in Chicago, or San Diego, or anywhere else for that matter.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Total Packers - Green Bay Packers News and Rumors

Find It!

No Result
View All Result

Subscribe to Total Packers via Email

Recent Posts

  • Love; Packers Fail to Impress in Preseason Opener
  • Big Expectations and Opportunity For Allen Lazard in 2022
  • 10 Reasons Why The Packers Have A High Chance Of Winning The Super Bowl
  • Green Bay Could Host the NFL Draft Soon
  • Packers 2022 Ominous Start
  • Bakhtiari Added to PUP
  • Packers Place 9 on PUP including Christian Watson and Sign TE Sal Cannella
  • Madden 23 Disses Packers Receiving Corps
  • Will Sammy Watkins Bring What the Packers Need?
  • Packers: Five Biggest Concerns Entering 2022 season
  • Early NFL 2022 Super Bowl futures value the Packers as contenders
  • PFF Ranks Packers Among 2022 Favorites

Recent Comments

  • Tom M on Love; Packers Fail to Impress in Preseason OpenerIf Ted Thompson knew after three years what he had with Aaron Rod…
  • PF4L on Love; Packers Fail to Impress in Preseason Opener*gauge **************** That question, might already have been as…
  • Tom M on Love; Packers Fail to Impress in Preseason OpenerOrdinarily I would agree. There were 33 players that didn’t even…
  • PF4L on Love; Packers Fail to Impress in Preseason OpenerI rarely make it through one pre-season game, i can't remember th…
  • Tom M on Love; Packers Fail to Impress in Preseason OpenerWhat I found interesting was the TD throw to Dobbs. You go back a…
  • PF4L on Love; Packers Fail to Impress in Preseason OpenerHoward hit it spot on once again, which shouldn't be a surprise t…
  • Howard on Love; Packers Fail to Impress in Preseason OpenerNo disrespect meant to the rookie receiver. Doubs. My auto correc…
  • Howard on Love; Packers Fail to Impress in Preseason OpenerI always want to see the Packers win. I also believe the it was a…
  • Tom M on Love; Packers Fail to Impress in Preseason OpenerYour right Kato. In his first preseason game last year Jordan Lov…
  • Kato on Love; Packers Fail to Impress in Preseason OpenerI honestly don't think the stat line does Love any favors. Was he…
  • PF4L on Love; Packers Fail to Impress in Preseason OpenerProblem....Sometimes you can't post in here for days, for whateve…
  • Tom M on Love; Packers Fail to Impress in Preseason OpenerIf your just going to look at the stat line for Jordan Love, then…

Popular Tags

A.J. Hawk Aaron Rodgers Brett Favre Brian Gutekunst Bryan Bulaga Charles Woodson Chicago Bears Chicago Bears Clay Matthews Clay Matthews III Dallas Cowboys Davante Adams Detroit Lions Detroit Lions Eddie Lacy fans Featured free agents game analysis Green Bay Packers Green Bay Packers Greg Jennings injuries Jay Cutler Jermichael Finley Jordy Nelson Mike McCarthy Mike McCarthy Minnesota Vikings Minnesota Vikings Morgan Burnett New England Patriots New Orleans Saints NFL Oakland Raiders Philadelphia Eagles Randall Cobb Sam Shields San Francisco 49ers Seattle Seahawks T.J. Lang Ted Thompson Ted Thompson Tramon Williams Ty Montgomery
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Subscribe to Total Packers via Email

  • Articles
  • News
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Website Terms of Use
  • Contact
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Articles
  • News
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Website Terms of Use
  • Contact

© 2022 Total Packers -- This site is not affiliated with the Green Bay Packers or Packers.com

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Analysis
  • Packers News
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

© 2022 Total Packers -- This site is not affiliated with the Green Bay Packers or Packers.com

en_USEN
es_ESES fr_FRFR nl_NLNL de_DEDE en_USEN
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.